Skip to main content

​
What is a Blind Teaser?

A blind teaser is an anonymous, one-page company profile distributed at the very beginning of a sell-side M&A process. Its purpose is to describe a company compellingly enough to generate acquisition interest — without revealing the company’s identity. Potential buyers who express interest are then asked to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA), after which they receive the full Confidential Information Memorandum (CIM). The teaser is the first impression a buyer gets of the opportunity. It uses a code name (e.g., “Project Falcon”), describes the business in general terms (“a leading provider of specialty industrial services in the Southeast United States”), and includes enough financial detail to attract serious buyers while filtering out tire-kickers. The art of a good teaser is saying enough to be compelling without saying so much that the company can be identified. Blind teasers are used in virtually every structured M&A process. They are produced by investment banks of all sizes — from Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley on multi-billion dollar deals to middle-market firms like Harris Williams and Baird on $50-500M transactions.

​
Why It Matters

  • Confidentiality protection: If word leaked that a company was for sale, it could destabilize employees, customers, suppliers, and (for public companies) the stock price. The teaser maintains anonymity during the initial outreach phase
  • Competitive tension: The teaser is distributed broadly to create competition among potential buyers. More interested parties means better terms for the seller
  • Efficiency: By providing enough information to filter serious buyers from casual inquirers, the teaser saves time for everyone. Buyers who are not interested can pass without wasting resources
  • Process documentation: The teaser distribution list becomes the outreach log for the entire process, tracking who was contacted, who responded, and who signed NDAs

​
Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Code NameA project name (e.g., “Project Atlas”) used instead of the company’s real name throughout the process
NDANon-Disclosure Agreement — must be signed before the buyer receives any identifying information
Investment HighlightsThe 4-6 most compelling reasons to acquire this company, written in anonymous terms
Sector DescriptorA general description that positions the company without naming it (e.g., “Leading Specialty Chemical Platform”)
Financial SummaryKey metrics (revenue, EBITDA, growth, margin) that help buyers assess fit without revealing identity
Transaction OverviewWhat is being offered (100% sale, majority stake, growth equity) and indicative timeline

​
Worked Example: Blind Teaser for Project Atlas

Below is a complete, production-quality teaser followed by an analysis of what makes it effective.

​
The Teaser

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

                        PROJECT ATLAS
         Leading Specialty Chemical Platform Serving
              the Aerospace & Defense Industry

                 CONFIDENTIAL -- FOR DISCUSSION
                       PURPOSES ONLY

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

COMPANY DESCRIPTION

The Company is a leading developer and manufacturer of specialty
coating formulations serving the global aerospace and defense
industries. Headquartered in the Southern United States, the
Company has established itself as one of the top three qualified
suppliers for mission-critical coating applications across
military and commercial aircraft platforms.

INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS

  ■  Market Leadership -- Top 3 position in aerospace specialty
     coatings with 15+ year average customer relationships
     and 97% gross customer retention

  ■  Highly Recurring Revenue -- 70%+ of revenue from
     specification-locked products with 18-24 month
     requalification barriers creating significant
     switching costs

  ■  Strong Financial Profile -- Revenue CAGR of 12%+ with
     EBITDA margins expanding from 17% to 21%+ over the
     last three fiscal years

  ■  Multiple Growth Levers -- New product launches,
     next-generation military platform qualifications,
     recently opened international manufacturing facility

  ■  Favorable Industry Dynamics -- Aerospace coatings market
     growing 6%+ driven by fleet expansion, military spending
     increases, and regulatory tightening

FINANCIAL SUMMARY

  ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
  │ Revenue              ~$85M       Revenue Growth  ~11%    │
  │ EBITDA               ~$18M       EBITDA Margin   ~21%    │
  │ Revenue CAGR (3yr)   ~12%        Employees       ~350    │
  └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

TRANSACTION OVERVIEW

The Company's majority shareholder is exploring strategic
alternatives, including a potential sale of 100% of the equity
interests. Management is committed to the business and willing
to participate in a go-forward ownership structure.

Interested parties should contact the undersigned to receive
a Non-Disclosure Agreement.

CONTACT:
[Banker Name], Managing Director
[Banker Name], Vice President
[Bank Name] | [Phone] | [Email]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This document is confidential and has been prepared by [Bank Name]
solely for informational purposes. This document does not constitute
an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

​
Why This Teaser Works

Company Description (2 sentences):
  • Says what the company does without naming it
  • Uses “Southern United States” instead of “Houston, Texas” (region, not city)
  • “Top three qualified suppliers” signals market position without being too specific
  • “Mission-critical” conveys defensibility
Investment Highlights (5 bullets):
  • Each bullet leads with a bold header for scannability
  • Every bullet contains a number (97% retention, 12% CAGR, 21% margins)
  • The highlights address what every buyer cares about: market position, revenue quality, financial performance, growth, and industry tailwinds
Financial Summary:
  • Uses approximate ranges (”~$85M”) rather than exact figures to reduce identifiability
  • Includes the 4 metrics that matter most: revenue, EBITDA, growth, and margins
  • Employee count gives a sense of scale without being too precise
Transaction Overview:
  • States the type of transaction (100% sale)
  • Notes management willingness to roll equity (important for PE buyers)
  • Provides clear next step (contact banker for NDA)

​
What Was Anonymized

Original DetailAnonymized VersionReason
Atlas Specialty Chemicals”The Company”Name removed
Houston, Texas”Southern United States”City too specific
F-35 program”next-generation military platform”Platform name identifies qualified suppliers
Sherwin-Williams (CFO background)Not mentionedWould narrow identification
285-345 employees (exact by year)“~350”Exact count too specific
$85.0M revenue”~$85M”Exact figure may be identifying in a small sector
Founded 1997Not mentionedYear + sector narrows candidates
Apex Capital Partners”majority shareholder”Sponsor name not disclosed

​
Full Skill Workflow (From SKILL.md)

​
Phase 1: Gather Inputs

Collect from the deal team:
  • Company description (what they do, how they make money)
  • Sector / industry classification
  • Key financial metrics: revenue, EBITDA, growth rate, margins
  • Geographic footprint (region-level only for anonymization)
  • Key selling points (3-5 investment highlights)
  • What to anonymize vs. what is safe to disclose
  • Target buyer audience (strategic, financial, or both)
  • Transaction type (100% sale, majority sale, growth equity, minority)

​
Phase 2: Draft the Teaser Structure

Build a one-page, professionally formatted document: Header: Deal code name, sector descriptor, “Confidential — For Discussion Purposes Only” Company Description (2-3 sentences):
  • What the company does, without naming it
  • Market position (e.g., “a leading provider of…”, “a top-3 player in…”)
  • Geography (region-level, not city-specific)
Investment Highlights (4-6 bullet points):
  • Market leadership / positioning
  • Revenue quality (recurring %, retention, diversification)
  • Growth profile and trajectory
  • Margin profile and expansion opportunity
  • Management team strength
  • Strategic value / synergy potential
Financial Summary (table or key metrics):
MetricValue
Revenue~$XXM
Revenue Growth~XX% CAGR
EBITDA~$XXM
EBITDA Margin~XX%
Employees~XXX
Transaction Overview (2-3 sentences):
  • What is being offered (100% sale, majority stake, growth equity)
  • Indicative timeline
  • Contact information for expressions of interest

​
Phase 3: Anonymization Check

Verify the teaser does not inadvertently identify the company:
CheckAction
Company nameRemove completely
Brand names or product namesUse generic descriptors
Specific city locationUse region (“Southeast US”, “Midwest”)
Named customers or partnersRemove or anonymize
Employee count (if distinctive)Use approximate range
Exact revenue (in small industry)Use ”~$XXM” ranges
Founding yearRemove (year + sector narrows candidates)
Specific certifications (e.g., “FAA Part 145”)Generalize or remove if too identifying
Logos, screenshots, imageryRemove completely
Named executivesRemove completely
The anonymization test: Ask yourself — could someone in this industry identify the company from this teaser? If yes, make it more generic. If a PE investor who knows the sector could narrow it to 2-3 companies, that is acceptable. If they can identify it with certainty, it is too specific.

​
Phase 4: Deliver Output

  • Word document (.docx) — one page, clean formatting
  • PDF version for distribution
  • Optional PowerPoint version (single slide format)

​
Common Mistakes (and How to Avoid Them)

What goes wrong: The teaser says “a leading manufacturer of aerospace coatings in Houston, TX with ~350 employees and $85M revenue, founded in 1997.” There are only 2-3 companies in the US that match all of those criteria. The teaser has effectively named the company.How to avoid it: Check each descriptor individually: Could this alone identify the company? Then check in combination: Do 3-4 descriptors together narrow it to one company? Use ranges instead of exact figures, regions instead of cities, and generalize any detail that is too specific.
What goes wrong: The teaser says “the company has strong financial performance” but does not include revenue, EBITDA, or growth metrics. A buyer cannot determine if the company is the right size, the right profitability profile, or growing fast enough to be interesting. They pass because they cannot assess fit.How to avoid it: Always include at minimum: revenue (approximate), EBITDA (approximate), growth rate, and EBITDA margin. These four data points let a buyer quickly assess strategic and financial fit. Without them, serious buyers cannot triage the opportunity.
What goes wrong: “World-class platform with unparalleled market position and industry-leading margins.” No numbers, no specifics, no evidence. Sophisticated buyers (PE firms that see 500+ teasers per year) immediately recognize this as marketing fluff and move on.How to avoid it: Replace superlatives with data. “Top 3 market position with ~21% EBITDA margins (vs. ~15% industry average)” is compelling. “World-class” and “unparalleled” are empty words that signal the bank has no real selling points.
What goes wrong: The teaser lists 10 investment highlights. By the time the buyer finishes reading, they have forgotten the first three. The message is diluted.How to avoid it: Limit to 4-6 highlights. Prioritize ruthlessly. If you cannot make the case in 5 bullets, adding 5 more will not help. Focus on what makes this company genuinely different from alternatives the buyer could pursue.
What goes wrong: The teaser is distributed before the client reviews it. The client objects to a description (“we are not just a ‘chemical company,’ we are a ‘specialty materials platform’”) or discovers a factual error. The bank must recall or correct the teaser, which is embarrassing and unprofessional.How to avoid it: The client must approve the teaser before distribution. Build in 2-3 days for client review. Common feedback: sector descriptor adjustments, emphasis changes, and factual corrections.
What goes wrong: The teaser is sent to 60 potential buyers, but no one tracks who received it. When buyers call back, the team does not know who they are or when the teaser was sent. The process becomes disorganized.How to avoid it: Create a distribution log before sending the first teaser. For each recipient, track: name, firm, role, date sent, response (interested/passed/no response), NDA status, and CIM sent status. This log becomes the process tracker for the entire deal.
What goes wrong: The sector descriptor says “Diversified Industrial Company.” This tells the buyer nothing about what the company actually does. It suggests the bank itself does not know how to position the opportunity.How to avoid it: The sector descriptor should be specific enough to convey the business while remaining anonymous. “Leading Specialty Chemical Platform Serving the Aerospace & Defense Industry” tells the buyer exactly what sector, what niche, and what end market — without naming the company.
What goes wrong: The teaser does not include a confidentiality notice. A recipient shares it with a competitor or posts it on an industry forum. There is no legal basis to object because the document did not assert confidentiality.How to avoid it: Every teaser must include: “Confidential — For Discussion Purposes Only” prominently, and a footer disclaimer stating the document is confidential, prepared solely for informational purposes, and does not constitute an offer. Legal should review the language.
What goes wrong: The teaser describes a company growing 15% with 25% margins. The buyer signs the NDA and receives the CIM, which shows 8% growth and 18% margins. The buyer feels misled and immediately loses trust in the bank and the process.How to avoid it: The teaser and CIM must tell the same story. If the teaser says “~12% revenue CAGR,” the CIM should show exactly that (or close to it). Round conservatively in the teaser so the CIM exceeds (not disappoints) the buyer’s expectations.
What goes wrong: The analyst spends 2 weeks perfecting a teaser with custom graphics, detailed market analysis, and 3 pages of content. The teaser is supposed to be a 1-page document that takes 2-3 days to produce.How to avoid it: The teaser’s job is to generate interest, not close a deal. Spend 2-3 days producing a clean, professional, one-page document. Save the detailed analysis for the CIM. A perfect teaser that takes 2 weeks is worse than a good teaser produced in 3 days, because the process starts 10 days later.

​
Daily Workflow Scenarios

​
Scenario 1: Drafting a Teaser for a New Sell-Side Mandate

Day 1: Receive briefing materials from the deal team (MD/VP). Review financial summary and identify the 5 strongest selling points. Draft the teaser. Day 2: Internal review with deal team. Get alignment on sector descriptor, anonymization level, and investment highlight priorities. Revise. Day 3: Send to client for review. Expect feedback within 2 business days. Day 4-5: Incorporate client feedback. Finalize. Create PDF version. Prepare distribution list.

​
Scenario 2: Teaser for a Technology/SaaS Company

Key differences from industrial teaser:
  • Financial metrics: ARR, net revenue retention, and growth rate instead of EBITDA and margin
  • Investment highlights: Focus on unit economics (CAC, LTV, payback), NDR, and product-led growth
  • Anonymization: Be careful with technology descriptions that might be too specific
Example financial summary for SaaS teaser:
MetricValue
ARR~$XX M
ARR Growth~XX%
Net Revenue Retention>1XX%
Gross Margin~XX%
Rule of 40XX+

​
Scenario 3: Producing Multiple Teasers for Different Buyer Types

Context: The same company could be attractive to strategic buyers (for different reasons) and financial sponsors (for different reasons). Consider producing tailored versions.
  • Strategic buyer version: Emphasize market position, customer relationships, synergy potential, and strategic value of the platform
  • Financial sponsor version: Emphasize growth profile, margin expansion opportunity, add-on acquisition pipeline, and management team quality
Important: Both versions must describe the same company consistently. Only the emphasis and language should differ, not the facts.

​
Practice Exercise

Exercise: Draft a Blind Teaser You are preparing a teaser for “Project Everest” — a B2B SaaS company providing workforce management software to healthcare systems. Company details (for your use only — these must be anonymized):
  • Name: MedStaff Solutions, Inc.
  • HQ: Nashville, Tennessee
  • Founded: 2015
  • ARR: $32M
  • ARR Growth: 45%
  • Net Revenue Retention: 125%
  • Gross Margin: 78%
  • Customers: 180 healthcare systems
  • Key product: AI-powered nurse scheduling platform
  • Competitors: Kronos (UKG), AMN Healthcare, ShiftMed
Task 1: Write the sector descriptor (one line that positions the company without naming it). Task 2: Write 5 investment highlights. Each should include at least one number. Task 3: Create the financial summary table (anonymized appropriately). Task 4: Write the company description (2-3 sentences, anonymous). Task 5: Review your draft for anonymization. Can someone in the healthcare staffing technology space identify this company from your teaser? What would you change if the answer is yes?

​
How to Add to Your Local Context

# Install the plugin
claude plugin install investment-banking@financial-services-plugins
Customizing for your firm: 
open ~/.claude/skills/investment-banking/teaser.md
Connecting to deal materials: 
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "deal-files": {
      "command": "file-server-mcp",
      "args": ["--root", "/path/to/deal-materials"]
    }
  }
}

​
Best Practices

  • Use aspirational but accurate language: “Leading”, “differentiated”, “high-growth” are fine descriptors if true. Do not overstate
  • Include enough financial detail to qualify buyers: Revenue, EBITDA, growth rate, and margin are the minimum. Serious buyers need these to assess fit
  • Test the anonymization: Ask yourself — could someone in this industry figure out which company this is? If yes, make it more generic
  • Always have client and legal review before distribution: The client may want to adjust emphasis; legal reviews the confidentiality notice
  • Track distribution: Every teaser sent should be logged with recipient name, firm, date sent, and response. This becomes the process tracker
  • Coordinate with the buyer list: The teaser distribution list should match the approved buyer universe from the buyer-list skill

​
Dependencies

Required:
  • DOCX skill for document creation
Optional:
  • PDF conversion for distribution
  • PPT skill for single-slide format
  • Buyer list skill for distribution coordination